Can you tell you which is written by a rapist, and which one is found in a magazine like FHM?
Seriously; click here, read this, and test yourself.
You’ll be grossed out.
… you should reconsider.
“Let the women play in more feminine clothes like they do in volleyball,”
“They could, for example, have tighter shorts.”
“Female players are pretty, if you excuse me for saying so, and they already have some different rules to men – such as playing with a lighter ball.”
“That decision was taken to create a more female aesthetic, so why not do it in fashion?”
sitting in a smokey shack today, an old man, covered to his jaw with tattoos, told me
“the woman is a silver coin. passed from man to man, going to the one who has money, because that’s what they like they don’t care about you; they care about your money”
which one ‘wows’ you the most?
i’ll share when the headache subsides.
regardless, boycott lysol.
thanks, business pundit.
Let’s take a look at the top 3 cosmetics companies in the world, shall we?
Proctor & Gamble– recording $82.6 billion in sales, maker of brands such as ‘Cover Girl’ (because girls must be covered) and sticking to the enlightening principle of testing on animal eyelids, has Robert Mcdonald as CEO and President.
L’Oréal – making a couple billion less than the monstrosity above, and the biggest cosmetic specialist in the world – making all sorts of shit for women to change morph their entire identities with, from hair to skin, has Jean-Paul Agnon as… wait for it… CEO and President.
Unilever – a $16 billion corporation, is proud two have two patriarchs in charge of pushing their chemicals – Michael Treschow as Chairman and Paul Polman as CEO.
What does this tell us?
dis-gusting; and it worked.
follow me, if you can: some idiot in the states has opened up a vegan strip-club.
ok i just got lost again.
way to go, moron: decades of thinking with your dick has managed to even give veganism a bad name.
while you’re here, feast your eyes on this piece of dick-thinking. peta, the people for the ethical treatment of animals, clearly out women a few steps below other animals. why do they think they can promote one ethical belief system by fostering a much more unethical one?
that it’s insinuating that if women have big breasts, they don’t need to know how to cook or that women are supposed to know how to cook, because they’re women.
it’s all so terrible…